THE BIG BANG - BULLETS
The Big Bang is Dead. Long live the Big Bang.
Murry Rhodes (c)20230303
Who killed the Big Bang? Where are the bullets?
May God forgive me.
I didn’t do it. It’s not my fault but the voices of science in my head told me to do it. It wasn’t me but The Big Bang Theory is dead. Long live The Big Bang Theory. The sovereign symbol of science of everything. TBBT May she rest in peace.
If you don’t know what The Big Bang Theory ( origin-of-the-universe theory) is then here is a link. My apologies for not describing it here in detail but it’s very long and full of complicated confusing fluffy things and questions. If you know and love The Big Bang Theory then you will already know the texts so please venture on. The image below may be a sufficient reminder.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
If I may. I hope by the end of reading this that for the time and costs that go into creating content and maintaining the site to remain free from big flashy advertisements I need a little help from you and so I do a little advertising of my own wares for sale. Your help in that department would be a true blessing.
I create music and designs for clothes. Below you will see a few items from my shop. The music and designs are mainly my own songs. This song is about my Grandad’s World War 1 experience and my designs are about vibrant life, colour and chance. It’s just nice things like birds, butterflies, FISH, space things and some funny fun ones too.
Nothing is forbidden when it comes to caring and sharing and compassion for others. If you see something you like then please share it on social media too. Who knows which of your tribe is looking for this type of article for entertainment or learning or things to buy?
The Big Bang - Bullets.
It’s not every day the Big Bang bites one so I hope you enjoy the moment.
Wikipedia may not be the most trusted official source of information to cite in academia but it is more or less the same primary Big Bang theory that I was taught in Physics - Astronomy 101 back in 2003 and the same Big Bang theory that is published almost everywhere other than in the Bible as the 100% absolute correct description of how the universe began. This is not an authorised academic article nor a religious bias perspective. Just an observation of observations of stuff.
The Big Bang is promoted as the absolute truth according to scientific media. It comes as a completely 100% absolutely proven to be true theory but with one little exception that cosmologists have no idea what happened in the moments before three minutes after time Zero or Plank Time. They say that science breaks down in that period. There are many theorists vying for fame and project funding to correctly determine what happened before that moment in time.
A time that demands a sizzling hot 10^32 degrees Celsius environment for everything in the universe to account for the creation/formation of subatomic and atomic particles to exist so they can then atomically and covalently attract and recombine during the thermodynamically cooling via expansion of the Big Bang explosion. With some measures of variation. For the probability of it, it’s like throwing a handful of sand in the ocean and hoping chaos will build a sand castle on the ocean bed. It’s possible but just highly unlikely amidst the chaos of creation, containment and expanding environment of it.
Yes, yes sometimes science does break down and we need some retail therapy buying Two-birdy shirts, Lizard drinking water bottles, Butterfly bags or lovely Crimson Moon/Finch wall art.
In the 1920s’, it was the science that made catholic priest and physics teacher Georgias Lemaitre publicly state that The Big Bang was the absolute truth because scientific evidence told him so. He said this regardless of the implications this might have had for his catholic indoctrination. He was compelled to speak the words.
Click on the video below to see him saying those words.
The science of it was good and as true as could be too. A few telescope enthusiasts had mentioned observations of the expansion of the universe. Different sources of observations made it true enough and the universe was later officially published and proven to be expanding by Edwin Hubble’s observation of the phenomena. So as a scientific observer, the observations of expansion seem to be true, correct and corroborated with evidence and collaborated for support.
Once the expansion was observed and proven, then began the other side of science to try to explain the observations. An expansion over time gives us the first intuitive tool of winding the clock back and bringing the expansion back to a point and time of some kind of explosion or Big Bang and so this is what Lemaitre did.
This was almost a hundred years ago around 1923-25 when telescopes, observations and bias were not what quite the same as todays. Indeed the most recent official science tells us unequivocally that not only is the universe expanding but the rate of expansion is accelerating outward from every point and in every direction. Another observation that is backed by corroborating evidence. So yes, I guess we can trust in the observational side of the science. Here’s a couple of links if you want more information on the expansion and accelerations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_expansion_of_the_universe
In 2025 The Big Bang Theory will be celebrating its 100th Birthday. Georgias Lemaitre as the official deliverer of the Cold Big Bang theory and Edwin Hubble added light and thermal energy to the clock winding mix for his Hot Big Bang and predictions of background radiation which unequivocally was proven to be absolutely 100% true by the observation of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation CMBR.
The theory of it also provided one of the more famously awkward and rare moments when the acclaimed genius of Albert Einstein was proven to be 100% unequivocally probably wrong and scientifically proven to be so. He hinted that he thought The Big Bang was waffly at best. Science does break down sometimes. We all break down sometimes.
Science is a fickle pickle sometimes, or at least we fickle pickle people can sometimes pickle on the fickle or get fickle on the pickle of the pickle like a fickle in a pickle or a pickle in a fickle of pickles. Did I mention there’s a tip button below? ;)
With modern technologies and studies, our science has proven that it is not only expanding but also accelerating. Another observation is that the rate of acceleration itself increases with greater distances. So not only is the Big Bang muted by the accelerating state, there is possibly a second bullet or finishing shot. Acceleration upon the acceleration for a double whammy.
If you clicked the links then you may have noticed that even today the explanations of descriptions still include a lot of fluffy grey areas of uncertainty. In some cases, the language is boggling and in others, the descriptions still seem to require a little faith that the science is right even though the evidence matrix is incomplete or non-conclusive.
One of the lessons we learn in life about the length of descriptions is that the longer and more complex they are, then the less certainty we have in the content being delivered in the text. Even from authoritative bodies and in today’s sociopolitical environment perhaps especially from trusted authorities.
With this in mind, the bullet that kills the Big Bang needs to be Fast, Accurate, Concise, True, Unbiased And Loaded. :) F.A.C.T.U.A.L in short.
The observations of the expansion of the universe gave birth to The Big Bang and it is the observed and unequivocal outward acceleration of that expansion that lays The Big Bang theory to rest or it should have already. I guess, Science giveth and Science taketh away as it pleases. Praise Science as it does work in mysterious ways. Why The Big Bang Theory hasn’t been put on notice earlier for this observed acceleration is a true mystery. Instead, accelerated expansion has just been added to the model like nothing is weird or breaking any laws of physics. Like a whimsy.
How is the outward acceleration of the physical universe the bullet for the Big Bang?
Science may work in mysterious ways but Gravity doesn’t. After a bang of any magnitude in space, gravity works to slow the expanding distribution. At least this has been the observation of exploding galaxy cores and stars ever since we’ve been observing them. They explode and gravity slows the expansion and eventually ( but for any slowing but super speedy specks that exceed the speed of gravity’s grasp) a Big Crunch would happen. That’s if things were slowly slowing but the expansion is not slowing down at all but very much quite the opposite. It’s accelerating with an increased acceleration rate so something else is going on.
So, I have presented my weapon of choice now it’s time to pack the powder and select the shot. We’ve had evidence of the accelerating expansion since the 1990s’ but somehow The Big Bang Theory didn’t really get challenged with it. Strange huh?
Strangely enough, the observation and consideration of Dark Energy may also throw a few of our other very famous theories of the laws of nature into a dark place so perhaps there are more reasons not to reveal such things in such ways that might upset the Big Bang applecart. Not that it matters if all or any of the laws are right or wrong because they serve as great learning tools for students to hone their skills for examining this universe. Meaning the Big bang theory has served us well but honestly, it’s time to call a priest to prepare the soul of The Big Bang Theory for an afterlife. There’s a sequence with many answers and much to learn from and without so much fluffy stuff. Simple and verifiable as it should be and as it is.
Acceleration in the outward direction means only one thing. F=ma and a=F/m so there is a force accelerating the masses outward.
On this macro scale of the universe, science has only a few forces to choose from. Magnetism/electric charge/static etc, Collisions of stuff and gravity. The others being offered by science are those such as interdimensional vacuums and vortexes or time travelling black holes from other interdimensional times and spaces of space-time. Wonderfully poetic possibilities but they don’t come with quite as much simplified certainty as our basic ones like watching an apple drop in a field of gravity, through a standard ( X, Y, Z ) 3-dimensional matrix of space over time that doesn’t bend with time but simple euclidian geometric vectors and induction of the fields. Our primitive mortal tools.
Drop an apple and it doesn’t need to enter some inter-dimensional space-time wormhole portal only to find itself opening up another portal and popping up on the ground at your feet after having transdimensional warp shifted through space and time. Don’t get me wrong I love science fiction but when the like of it enters science for serious consideration I pause…
It’s fluffy stuff that ignores the facts that old euclidian geometry is an imaginary grid and remains ever unwarped from and including Zero to Infinity and with conventional trigonometric vector transitions. A matrix that can’t affect nor be affected by any physical things because it is our imaginary standard of space.
What the stuff inside that matrix does is all physical and so we must keep our matrix unwarped if we are to understand the universe physical nature of the natural physical universe. Warping it with time as a spatial dimension is forcing space to fit your narrative or theory because you’ve not the technology or know how to make the required observations of the physical phenomena influencing the stuff. Imagine if Maxwell, faraday or Lenz concluded electromagnetism or induction occurred in some extra-dimensional plane. It may be true but we wouldn't have the tools to do the things we need to do.
Anyway, An apple just drops, accelerated by the resultant field vectors of gravity. The simple stuff is more palatable than all that fluffy stuff above.
Back to our options of sources for forces of courses.
Collisions of stuff? There are a few explosions and mineral distributions going on out in space but no sequential accelerating collisions are observed to be associated with such accelerated accelerations. We can be certain of this for now. Unless we discover wormholes pushing stuff out.
Accelerating outward by Light sailing effects? By the Inverse-square law of distance (1/r^2), any acceleration force imparted by light or other electromagnetic radiations reduces by the square of the distance so light or other radiations may play some role but any force it might impart on a system reduces as the outward expanding masses get further out. The observed increased rates of acceleration outward counter the reduced effectiveness of the accelerating force of light.
Static Charge/ Magnetism? Hmmm. A body moving through a magnetic field does alter its charge and for the polarity of positive and negative or north and south we do get a repelling force so if everything moving around was somehow constantly gaining the same electrical charge then this might be quite a good suspect. Dust on the surfaces of the moon has apparently been observed to float possibly by static electric influences of charge. I like this one for its dynamic but not nearly as much as the next one.
Gravity? No big mystery here. Drop an apple and it drops. Every time. Try the experiment if you’re in doubt. It’s a well enough known phenomenon in our universe for us to have a little more confidence considering that gravity being as invisible as it is, is the main culprit for the expansion acceleration but then also with some geometry considered for the accelerated rate of that acceleration as things get further out and closer to the edge or border of our physical universe.
When tackling the wonderful enormity of our physical universe suspended in a matrix of space. There are two things to consider. First is the geometric space or assumed emptiness of space that expands to infinity and then there is the physical universe that has stuff in it that resists other stuff easily and this physical stuff is most likely finite. Physical stuff that formed from some process interacting with the fabric of space and whatever that process was, we can’t observe it or identify it with any real confidence. There is a way to do it but we’ll need to figure out if the return on our investment is worth the true cost of that investment. A lot of folks have gone very hungry to pay for some of our lower-return pursuits for knowledge.
So we only know what we know. We have some tools to help us figure out if what we think we know and hopefully those tools help us know a little more about what we think we know or indeed even completely turn the tables on what we think we thought we knew. Tis the fickle pickle people phenomenon. But such a wonderful mystery for us to explore free of guillotines.
You may have heard of Dark Matter and Dark Energy and the reasons given why these things must necessarily exist. I’m not overly sold on dark matter but as you will see for exploring the expansion of the universe to be accelerating outward then Dark Energy is certainly a force for some cool consideration.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
What I’m about to describe uses simple geometry of spheres and the inverse square of distance relationship of a system that if Dark Energy exists as something suspended in the fabric of space then the phenomena of the expansion are accountable by the gravity of that Dark Energy. The increased rate of that acceleration is in that geometric solution too.
Let’s look at the geometry of a physical universe that formed out of some process and left behind a region of pellets. Pellets that by the law of conservation of energy and mass did not come from Nothing and so had to be extracted from the fabric itself thus leaving an immediate local region with pellets of stuff and a somewhat depleted immediate space of space fabric around the pellets like a bubble. A region depleted of the dark energy that remains in greater concentrations outside of the zone where the physical universe was made.
At present scientists are theorising a particle responsible for dark energy. To date, none have been detected and they are not quite sure where to look, how to detect it or what experiments to try to find it. So the observations leading to the suggestion of Dark Energy raise questions but unfortunately, this observation even without the material evidence or finding the particle, the observation voids the theory of the Big Bang as you will see.
Yes, bangs happen in our universe and big ones and they give off all sorts of wonderful electromagnetic signatures to ripple around space. Most of everything we know of our universe is electromagnetic in nature. Electromagnetism is the result of the electron and proton relationship that provides the resistance of fields in symmetries with atomic nuclides that make matter interact as it does. It’s really quite a wonderful state of nature even with all the complex chaos or perhaps especially so.
An electron and proton pair are two particles that have only ever been observed coming into existence when a neutron decays to spin off and eject an electron and other stuff out leaving the main body of the neutron phase changed electrically to become a proton. A proton is the equal opposite polar attractive charge of an electron.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_neutron_decay
So The Big Bang Theory goes through a wonderful description of how photons and electrons and protons are formed through probabilistic encounters and phase constructive unity with electromagnetic radiations. Electromagnetic radiation that can’t exist until electrons exist. A cyclic conundrum.
So if FREE Neutron decay is truly the only method of making protons and electrons and if all our universe is built on the electromagnetic interactions between them then first things first, how did neutrons get made and how did the 10^32 degrees Celsius come to exist without protons and electrons to transmit, receive, recognise and communicate the thermal energy as thermal energy.
I enjoy exploring this topic and have some cool suggestions about this stuff that you can find in my other works. All my works are just a work-in-progress and as I learn more about things then some of my early thoughts change and evolve into the present as it is at the time of writing. When the world is saturated with so much information it is hard to filter out the truth without getting stuck or clogged up sometimes. So if you have better evidence than what I present then don’t be shy. Belief in stuff is about the only thing I try to avoid. That and egos. Life is too short to run around with egos and banners of belief and there’s so much cool stuff to learn about and maybe help advance our knowledge of stuff before we zip back to our original state. :)
You may find some of my movie animations online at YouTube or at a website so if you like this article then there’s more for you to find and all sorts of science and spiritual stuff too. You’ll see all this emerging in my music and designs. As much as I love facts and figures I also love the realms of creativity and spirituality, especially for the compassion, love and sanctity of what it is to be alive nd conscious in this universe of stuff.
So the Diagram. Check it out and make your own deductions.
The image “Physical Universes (101)” can be read in two ways. The first is a simple, intuitive way for those who simply want an easy obvious answer. Look at the Red Triangles, by size alone which one would win if it were a pushing contest? It’s not a pushing contest but you get the gist. Indeed it’s a pulling contest and quite the polar opposite of a thermodynamic pressure cell. Where increased thermal energy pushes, increased gravitational energy pulls. But now I’ve said that, it should be obvious.
Or
For those of us who enjoy a complex averaging of all the vector components of both the clumpy bits, the empty inner region of our bubble and the outer grey region. A region which for the purpose of this mental exercise is saturated in suspended Dark Energy out to infinity. A few other physical universes are likely to exist in that infinite space and of various sizes, ages and distances for the 1/r^2 inverse square law to reduce their gravitational effect to almost complete redundancy in the background of all the infinity of the Dark Energy stuff.
Once you treat the homogeneous nature of the dark energy as a fairly constant vector component since it extends to infinity then you’ll realise that is not the presence of any gravitational matter or force that is causing the outward acceleration of the expansion process but indeed the increased absence of matter along the longest line from the point to the boundary. A region reduced of its homogeneous mass properties to small concentrated pellets that also contract on the 1/r^2 law in proximity and so over all that longest line to the boundary is where less matter/mass/gravity is acting. So all the vectors resolve more often to the outward direction. To be pedantic, the physical universe is not a sphere but this just a model to present the concept.
Observe it with the 1/r^2 of gravity forces at various distances to and from boundaries as well as the gaps between the particles. It’s the gaps between particles that provide the shortfall of gravitation at 1/r^2 and resolve the vector out toward the outer boundary of the system. In such a system with moving clumps of lumpy stuff and with an external environment that contains some field force ( a suspended Dark Energy property out to possibly infinity. Is it a particle or just some flux field of some description? ) Either way the truth of it is in your hands. This is just an observation that for me is the clear and present overriding evidence that the Big Bang is not only incomplete but is quite incorrect.
The Big Bang is dead, May her legacy be the many lessons she taught us and science gleaned in pursuit of her knowledge. The Big Bang is dead, long love The Big Bang.
This is the science, the whole science and nothing but the science so help us science.
So this article above precedes making and animation Part 8 of the universe concepts I play around with. You may enjoy the whole series.. Some are only a minute long and others are a few minutes. I’m just working on a longer version of the beginning of Time in this physical universe now.. Anyway, check them out.. They may be entertaining and the maths and stuff is fast forwarded in most of it so if you want ti look at the sums behind the theories then use the pause button and have a read. :) enjoy.
