Scribbling Secret Sacred Notes & A Luke-Warm Bang of Considerable size.
MW Rhodes © 20230108
Dear Inquisitive You,
I wish you all the best. Say, since you’re here…
Do you want to know how the physical universe began?
This is a 20 min read so if you’re not a big reader I’ve prepared an animation related to this topic that you can find a link to down the bottom. :) It’s a bit of fun and comes with some nice music. There’s a contact form for your feedback and a JOY button down there too if you enjoyed the read or the movie and feel like showing your appreciation for the art of these musings. A little Joy goes a long way and helps heaps.
Thank you in advance.
It begins.
It all began from a cold, dark field flux of stuff suspended in the fabric of the Universe of Infinite Stuff. Then it got tangled up at Zero Degrees Kelvin (by definition) and some tightly ordered chaos produced the first lumps of stuff that would Beta decay into the wonderful cornucopia of electromagnetic, electrostatic and gravitational paths of least resistance that we observe in the many complex disciplines of science tracing back through the chaos to some kind of beginning. From micro to macro systems the laws of nature are wonderfully predictable even with all the chaos that ensured up to right now. :)
I’m not authorised to write this stuff. So by all means, discuss it with your friends but whatever you do, don’t use it in your school tests. Your school tests are mainly to determine how well you can learn new tools and replicate old information. So pass your tests, gain the tools needed for further learning but be aware that the information being taught in school is like an example only and more for the purpose of gaining the tools than having to believe word for word the examples being used are real and practical in the world.
After all in maths, How often do you buy a hundred pineapples at the corner store? Data is data and the tools for attaining them are pretty good, but sometimes our interpretations of data can get a little blurry. Sometimes they can be influenced by other things like authoritarian requirements, financial gains or other such things. We have a silly history of being human in these ways.
Some folks call it corruption, others just say, that’s life. Either way, it’s nice to be aware of things like that because as you enter the worlds of humans you learn that right and wrong is sometimes a personal choice and sometimes a prerequisite to join some kind of club. We have plenty of silly critter ways about us so don’t fret if your research tells a different kind of truth. At the end of the day, some things only get deemed as officially true if there is enough political or economical leverage behind them. Gallileo had a lot more leverage than most folks which may be the main reason why it came to be known that the planets orbit the Sun, officially. :) Good lord, could you imagine if we all believed in a Flat Earth? How would we explain flushed toilets that swirl around in opposite directions? :)
I’m just an enthusiast with some university tools. I was a mature-age undergrad student back around 2002-2006. I studied, physics, maths, astronomy, geology, chemistry and even archaeology plus other stuff. After Uni I worked in geophysics for mining exploration and then installing electrical systems and at the moment I’m singing songs and playing the piano in pubs and clubs and Aussie outback resorts. Surviving on tips and the kindness of strangers. So I’m not authorised but I have some tools of analysis for problem-solving in my tool bag. What I’m about to go through might come in handy for those authorised folks who get paid for stuff.
So I have a few cool school tools and have some skills at solving problems well enough but am not an authority. So answer questions in your school tests, the way you’ve been trained to do. Your teachers aren’t authorities either. They deliver information from modules. They may know some of what they teach but rarely are they experts so they really can’t or don’t know how to answer any tricky questions that you might ask. Your teacher not knowing an answer to a question you thought up is not unusual and is not a bad thing. Although sometimes I think the frustration of not being able to answer questions may get responded to as ADHD or some other problem you might need a doctor’s diagnosis for. Taking a pill to kill our innocent inquisitive nature may be stealing the same creativity we used to figure out the magic of making fire or other such things.
Part of a teacher’s job is to show you how to research and form the answer to your own questions. As great as teachers are for doing their job, the education system itself isn’t always about a student learning how to learn as the system itself can be influenced by funding to promote the training of students as parrots who pass tests so the school can produce higher education results for brand equity and funding for the school.
Sadly this type of system only trains parrots and some Universities have been crying out for decades that critical thinking of new school students coming into universities is very lacking. It has been officially recognised and so one solution is that they are now making classes and courses to teach people how to think critically. If passing such a course means being tested and getting the answers right in the test and if those test results get used for improving the finances of the school then I feel the course administrators/designers might have completely missed the whole point. I recently did a science course online and the lecturer noted the importance of critical thinking and different ways of how to say “this result indicates that further funding is required”.. Of course, the word ‘funding’ is synonymous or interchangeable with the word research. The sad truth is that the only benefits of critical thinking are thought of in this way.
So I guess the best way to look at school is that it’s where you can learn some handy tricks and pick up some tools like 1 + 1 = 2 or y=f(x)=mx+b and ABC and How Now Brown Cow, make friends and have fun but separate those academic tools from the narratives that sometimes get taught as ultimate truths. Once upon a time that truth was about God, these days it’s about Science and tomorrow it may be about worshipping some other authority or corporation’s logo. Cest La Vie.. Such is life, such as it is.
These cool school tools are for you to go out and discover more and test more stuff, understand what others are doing to try to answer either the same or similar question. Learn the knowledge, be a good parrot and pass your tests, get a job with those tools and if you’re super lucky and have not been blindly indoctrinated into the narratives for your wages then you may use those tools to explore even those old narratives and theories that you didn’t quite agree with or that made much sense given other things that you had learned from other disciplines.
Anyway, my apologies I was not intending to discuss education systems. Let’s get on with the Universe of infinite stuff. So if you do have some maths and research skills then use them below. You’ll find some of my maths scribbles in the animated movie version which you’ll find a link to below. The maths level is perhaps Year 10, or higher. Nothing outrageous though after all, the universe started from simpler beginnings.
So not everyone gets to study what I have and the time to research things in science journals and docos etc. I see lots of fluffy stuff going on in the mainstream. Lots of science presenters present science as it is written word for word like in the bible for the safety of not blaspheming the authorities of all knowledge and most of the journals seem to be more about those creative ways to sell the need for more project research funding from governments or private investors rather than just exploring stuff for solutions. If you’re a student, this financial stuff is very real but it’s not an open discussion so it’s not even worth complaining about as the constitutionalism of science is almost as crystalised as the church once was. You dare not blaspheme against the lord Albert Christ or other such idols.
So I’ve been busy taking notes and reckon I have a pretty good understanding of the science that is explained. I also have some reasonable problem-solving skills and I think I can explain the universe in simpler more accessible terms than you might hear more authorised folk’s versions of the universe. High school students might really enjoy this as the applicable maths is not overly outrageous or tertiary. Just geometry and algebra.
The ideas coming out of my notes are a little bit different than the current conventional pearls of wisdom but they’re not so much different to be considered a full-on pseudoscience. They still abide by the laws of nature and the evidence already exists but just the interpretations are a bit different. So since I’m not an authority or not being paid to write this stuff, it’s fully independent and I’m sure you’ll get some value out of reading it for better or worse and so maybe by the end you’ll be happy to pay a tip of appreciation into the Tip-Hat or JOY buttons way below. If you can that would certainly help this piano man sing more songs and tell more stories.
Cheers :)
Enjoy.
Here are some of my scribbles of a series of secret sacred notes about the Universe. Dark Energy fiction with Two possible sources and Two pieces of Music accompanying the animations. Beethovens Fur Elise and my own "Whispers in the wind"... If you like this and want to learn more or see more videos or articles then you know what to do. Subscribe, Click like and enjoy the series. :)
In the universe of infinite space, time is inconsequential. Almost completely irrelevant in the bigger scheme of things. Only useful to determine rates of stuff.
In the physical universe ( the lumpiverse ) and with its light and gravity sphere still communicating out the very first moments of when our physical universe started coming into being. Albeit with an increasingly decreasing wave front of communication under the proportionality of the inverse square of distance laws.
A physical universe is simply a result to a local function state of the fabric of the Universe of infinite space and it’s very unlikely to be the only occurrence in such a universe of such Infinitum.
Gravity is far more primal than light and as best we can tell by the Higgs Boson the very act of constricting a field of flux only serves to concentrate the properties of mass that lay suspended in the flux-type fabric of space. By concentrating it into a bundle means at least a depletion of that property from the fabric itself. This leaves space containing three states of stuff. The initial state, the lumps and the partially depleted region of the initial state tangled into the lumpy state.
Sorry to be so simple and colloquial but you’ll find the maths concurs.
As we reverse time to before all the initial chaos led to the many least resistive pathways to the present, we arrive at a much simpler time and place in space without electromagnetism, particle physics, without thermodynamics. A time and place without time but only properties of mass/gravity and an Infinitum of cold fabric that can communicate properties of gravity.
We have some geometry of the most primal law of nature we know which is the inverse square of the distance and if the physical universe is expanding evenly in every direction and if this expansion is due to gravitational attraction rather than an electrostatic force then one might consider that the universe of infinite space ( not the physical universe ) but the almost empty universe of infinite space has some evenly distributed properties of mass being gravity. Evenly in all directions as seen from outside of our physical universe.
So we also have some stuff suspended in the fabric with properties of gravity. Stuff that may not be a particle by definition but simply a property of the flux type stuff that gets tightly wound and bound into a particle with much higher concentrations of the properties of mass.
So we have gravity and geometry before a physical universe can exist. Two simple enough things to work with.
The inverse square of distance is that primal law and as long as no two coordinates in the (X, Y, Z) dimensions of any two different positions are the same then the inverse square of distance law applies.
What this means mathematically is that the most complex maths will only get tangled when trying to solve the simplest of physical states. For example, a wavelength of bonding energy is finite and the inductive nature of polarity as it propagates can complicate things when looking at a length smaller than its own length such as when x-> infinity for 1/x. Where cos and sin polar components of a field induce a vector of resistance in this short distance and under the 1/r^2 inverse square law influence its own field.
Such complexity is not needed and thankfully this means that any child with the basic tools of geometry and linear algebra can resolve the initial state of the universe.
This is a nice thing because the origins of our universe should be accessible knowledge to most folks even primary schoolchildren and not just held as some holy grain of the elite minds that can perform acrobatic mathematical feats to comprehend our most complex language of maths for tracing back every twist and turn of those paths of least resistance provided by chaos.
Complex maths is a nice set of tools for realising and refining ideas into complex engineering in a way that manipulates natural paths of least resistance into material methods and means that can benefit us in life. Indeed the more acrobatic maths folks here may enjoy the challenges below.
The challenges are about the recent observation of Betelgeuse and establishing a stellar algorithm for when cooling star bodies might enter a phase that may indicate when stars might do what Betelgeuse did in Jan 2019. Naughty Betelgeuse doing such an unexpected thing by the mainstream conventional wisdom. But before you get to that one, there is also a nice one where you can try your skills determining the time frame from when the sequence below starts to when it can produce a distribution event. Wonderfully our folks in Caltech refined the rate of free neutron decay in a lab environment to have a half-life of around 15 minutes. So you can simply run the chemistry of the primary elements and figure out the time from start to finish of this initial sequence below.
It may not be exact but the margins of difference and the confidence intervals are cool and it’ll be fun for some.
You may find one of my earlier posts with the spiral planet formation model that I formed back in the mid-1990s’. It predicted this exact type of event. It was one of those theories that couldn’t be proven until it was seen. So it remained a questionable theory against the educated narrative of gravitational collapse and accretion disc formations being the only accepted planet formation theories of the day.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2022/hubble-sees-red-supergiant-star-betelgeuse-slowly-recovering-after-blowing-its-top/
Big Bangers ’n' Mash.
Are you confused about all the mashed-up hype over the Big Bang? You may hear folks from positions of authority discuss inter-dimensional portholes and multiverses and many wonderful things. Things about black holes and worlds that exist within an Infinitum of micro variations of this very universe we experience. You turned left instead of right in one universe and life turned out completely different, type of stuff. True enough that our philosophical questions can send us around the twists of Infinitum and if you have enough authority then those whimsical twists can become unequivocal truths. We had nearly 2000 years of God and Jesus being the only answer to everything.
Now we have Einstein and other idols of worship in the name of science. God help us for the corporate authorities too. They’re like the church but without any promotion of love, compassion or forgiveness. It’s just about making the most efficient profits.
We really are silly critters in many ways and Oh so often things have started with the best of intentions but almost every time just become woven with greed. The Royal Society of science started as a group of folks who were tired of the authorised versions of the Bible and wanted just plain old science to help solve problems. Then that organised group became an authority and although it still presents as an institute of truth, there are still corruptions such as they are that protect the verity of the knowledge and the value of the institute to the community.
My science adventure started back in the mid-1990s’ when I watched a BBC documentary on the cosmos. I can’t be sure which series it was but the final episode was on the Big Bang and the star life cycles and the supernova descriptions had me a bit worried. It had some authorised expert of science closing the series with a comment like. “ If you believe anything other than what we’ve just presented, then you are sadly misinformed” The comment was like dropping a bombshell on all that I’d just watched and understood to be the truth the whole truth and the actual way things were but this closing comment struck a chord of uncertainty in all of it. It didn’t sound very scientific at all. I mean, 1 + 1 = 2, an apple drops due to gravity every time and the authorities of highly complicated knowledge can’t be wrong. But now this expert was asking us to believe as if the information was not really backed up by much evidence.
It’s funny because even now, most of us trust in those folks being paid to solve problems that we mere mortals simply can’t afford the time to do. But dig a little deeper and you find that many of these experts are still just experimenting with ideas that may or may not be correct. I did dig a little deeper at the time and came up with a physics model and some very basic iterative maths using the best data I could source from bookstores and libraries.
After only a few months of study, my understanding or comprehension or interpretations of the cosmos was a little different than the mainstream and so began a path of discovery in academia at the university which only confirmed the uncertainty of some sciences and the heretical, tribal protectionism of the elitist concepts for projects to be funded by either taxpayers or private investors.
I kind of lost my heart in the romantic notion that knowledge was sacred where I found it either to be secreted away or scribbled into some kind of confusing saturation of publications all critically asking for more money. The Scribbles of Secret Sacred notes.
Some more authorised theorists may also venture into the subconscious realm of existence and consciousness while others in authority dismiss these with their incredibly complex mathematical models in languages that only elite specialists, specialised in their special fields of study can possibly comprehend and concur with each other’s comprehension of comprehension to save the face of confusion for private contemplations.
This is the fluffy stuff I mentioned. The solution of our universe can really only ever boil down to the least complex system of our known physical universe because that’s precisely what our local space of the universe of infinite space was. It was simple and so only simple tools need to be applied.
The officially authorised Big Bang stuff.
In the first few moments of all time up to around the three minutes past Plank time, Big Bang theorists must be able to 1. Create and 2. Contain thermal energy and then 3. Reverse the containing conditions and be able to account for all the thermal energy of the universe that does and will exist. “If you don’t ascribe to or worship this theory then you are sadly misinformed.” Is the general gist.
An environment of greater than 10^32 degrees is required to satisfy the condition that would have subatomic particles be considered sufficiently distant from their nuclear nodes to be considered separated enough for the formation of them to occur as separate particles and without influencing each other during bulk mass property production. Eg like the thermal energy that pushes electrons out from the core/node/nucleus and effectively for all intent and purpose is sufficiently distant from the nucleus to be considered a particle of its own closed system accord.
And all that stuff happens within three minutes from a moment as determined by the Plank length of electromagnetic and subatomic communications of flux over a calibrated time interval. To give us Plank Time. Pretty special kind of miraculous stuff.
Making and containing the energy of 10^32 degrees Kelvin or greater has no natural path of least resistance from an initial state so it’s not something nature can do, at least not easily. It’s not something we can successfully achieve in our labs either I think the best we can do is 10^9 or 10^12 maybe. It’s only a mathematical prediction based on some observations of atom bonds spreading out while gaining thermal energy. The functions-of-state of molecules from solid, liquid, gas, plasma etc could not be predicted accurately mathematically without first observing these thresholds and behaviours so our maths is awesome for stuff we can confirm physically but not so great at truly predicting stuff for the pure discovery of stuff that provides the foundations for the maths. Once the flight was achieved there were TWO strains of science and laths that could define it. Neither is wrong only one may be simpler for the understanding. Similarly as with the refraction of light through different refractive substances. If they are both right, then which is most efficient? To save students time and energy for the learning of a tool that works and how it works.
Energy has been our main currency of concern for analysing and quantifying our universe/environment but energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only transformed and so our only observation in this whole universe of natural systems has been that particles with properties of mass can transform some of those properties into Energy. We have not observed anywhere in nature for the opposite to occur. This raises the question that if we cannot make mass out of energy then why is this thermal energy a requirement of making particles with properties of mass? As it is in the Big Bang. Perhaps M=e/c^2 is more apt.
A LUKE WARM BANG OF CONSIDERABLE SIZE.
So the Big Bang is Bogus? It’s not incomplete or wrong. It is just an old loved and worshipped theory that started a hundred years ago and became a nice evidence matrix and way of demonstrating our progress in nuclear physics and chemistry. The correct cosmology of it was less important as indeed even now it’s not so important economically but if we are to ever go out into deep space then it becomes invaluable knowledge for our survival in that cold dark environment. More on the survival stuff later.
Around 1923, Georgias Lemaitre suggested a Cold Big Bang in response to observations of an expanding universe of distant galaxies moving away from us in at least several directions. Since its acceptance as a legitimate theory, the growing evidence matrix has altered it a little like from a cold singularity to a hot singularity and well, discussions are ongoing but it seems that they absolutely, unequivocally must include a thermal component to satisfy the residual radiations of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation. The Hubble stuff. and subsequent nuclear studies suggesting greater than 10^32 degrees Kelvin is needed for any kind of origins theory like the BIG BANG. Placing the Cold Big Bang further back down the line.
A sequence from cold mass produced in a Zero Degrees Kelvin environment ( by definition ) where radiological Beta decay of newly formed free neutrons plus the gravitational accumulation of mass/properties provides the environment for chaos to begin complicating things with electromagnetism, thermodynamics, particle physics, chemistry and more.
A sequence that leads to a high probability and strong confidence interval for a thermonuclear event from primary elements being formed in a cold system. A shell of Lithium precipitate is the prime suspect given its unstable nuclide and its shell formation provides a very efficient transfer of energy in such an event.
A sequence with a core dominated by Free Neutrons that may not be quite as free as the ones we observe decaying in labs. Indeed under such gravity, a type of environment and function of state where Free Neutrons may even bond to share their fields as like a Proton Neutron bond and slow or stop the beta decay process. Is H2 a product of such a particle? H is already a product of the natural neutron decay process. So. Perhaps Caltech or other institutes could test this. H = Hydrogen.
A sequence collated by gravity where the decay products form shells around the neutron core stratified by mass/density/charge properties of each permutation of isotopes in their natural symmetries. We get a sequence that where n = Free Neutron, H = Hydrogen, He = Helium and Li = Lithium and n->H->He->Li=> EDE (Elliptical Distribution Event).
A bang of considerable size. How do we get any BANG from this?
With Lithium’s state of function melting point at around 450 degrees Kelvin. It’s physical and chemical properties in the system (n,H,He) system collate it as a the first shell around the neutron core. Neutron density is greater than Lithium’s complex state. It’s a thin soft metal that can form a shell between the neutron core and the H & He shells above.
A note on thermal regulation - Any thermal energy coming from the actively decaying neutron core is freely transported away from the core by the convections of the H & He so this is still a very cold system and the core remains regulated by this transfer of thermal energy. As H or He gains some thermal energy, the electron shells spread out on average and reduce the density of the atoms and or molecules as they may be.
That is unless something insulates the core from direct contact which as you may now consider that Lithium is a soft metal when below 450 degrees Kelvin and since H & He are liquids at around 0.5 - 15 degrees Kelvin that the Lithium will be a solid as it precipitates and collates down onto and around the neutron core. Insulating it from the H & He above.
As particles go, the neutron is the most dense out of all of its primary, secondary and tertiary decay products so free neutrons or neutron - neutron bound particles will dominate the core and have some resistive properties of being a solid equivalent when at such low thermal energy and under such gravity. Gravity accumulation to be greater than or perhaps even hinting to galaxy cores, black hole type scenarios of more and yet still we avoid entering into the wonderful time-space loop considerations of inter-dimensional portholes. I know, I’m boring.
So with the Lithium seal, the Core can now heat up to and perhaps beyond 450 degrees Kelvin. The Lithium shell melts at any one point and exposes the Hot core to the Liquid H & He. In high gravity pressure this thermal transfer may or may not cause the H&He to vaporise into a gas but regardless if it can or not, it wants to and so the physics of it is kinetic and the percussive response is sufficient to trigger the Neutron - neutron chain reaction of the Lithium Nuclide.
To say the least, a spheroidal shell of Nuclear fuel is the most efficient kinetic transfer of energy in any blast/distribution type events. It’s why our own nuclear bombs are shaped as such. A most dynamic transfer inward and outward with the inward leading to a fully constructive wave of around 49% of the total nuclear kinetics concentrating in toward the neutron core and 49% of the nuclear kinetics pushing outward and at the same time the functions of state of the H&He play a role in this dynamic as the Lithium Shell disintegrates and fully exposes the neutron core thermals to the H&He.
% Figures are not fixed as the efficiency of the transfer of energy is determined by mass/density/charge of the two main bodies. Inner core and outer shells.
The 49% going toward the core centre should give us some indication of extreme peak signatures and energy spikes during this process as it will be the highest of all energy transformations in this system.
So we have a total of three physical environments. The outward, the inward and the transition shell where approx. 2% energy of the transition may be consumed for regional fusions. Three dynamic systems where neutrons, electrons and protons exist in novel environments where chaos and symmetries play their role atomically and determine some new more complex nuclide element formations.
The Lithium shell disintegrates and this is where the thermal component of 10^32 degrees Kelvin may play its role in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation requirement of such bangs.
The expected debris of such a distribution event will include bulk H & He and bulk clumps of the core material dominated by free neutrons plus the possible non/slow decaying Neutron-Neutron bound particle. A Dark Matter perhaps. As well as a fairly uniform distribution of newly formed trace elements. 2% energy absorbed into new elements.
This ends the initial Bang.
As you can see that compared to the requirement of 10^32 degrees for all matter in the universe that this sequence described above is still quite a considerable sized bang but at 450 Degrees Kelvin it does not require a non-reproducible thermal environment for the whole universe to be contained and then magically released within three minutes of time Zero.
Indeed if the decay rate of Free Neutrons in this scenario is around the same as in our labs ( a half-life of around 10-15 minutes ) then a time frame can likely be determined and this will need the wonderfully skilful mathematical acrobats to strut their stuff on the high wire of the universe.
After this ellipse distribution, physics is physics and after the initial outward motions have been sufficiently slowed by gravity the pancake gravitational collapse theory may be considered as well as some accretions from the core. Make no mistake, what started out as a very cold thermal system run only by gravity and mass and the decay of a body of newly formed neutrons this system is now no longer a cold thermal system at all as it now has the fully developed electromagnetic, electrostatic, thermodynamic, Kinetic transfers of energy and motions and gravitations and let’s face it, a far more chaotic system than the passive whimpering rain of neutrons that it started out as.
Indeed so chaotic and yet still bound by the natural laws that a secondary method of distribution came into existence.
This is the Spiral Distribution SD and it can happen on Galactic (GSD) scales and right down to spinning specks of hot molten stuff where angular momentum and other motions work against the chemistry of atoms and thermodynamics of systems to ( Like a wet Tennis Ball ) send out tiny splatters of splatter matter. Some as solids, some as liquids, some as gasses and some as plasmas and each type creates its own wonderful system of dynamics with the full tool belt of radiations and gravitations, collisions and cumulative combinations and permutations of well-ordered chaos.
The chaos that made you and I and a bright blue sky.
Thank you for reading this, if you get a chance to read my notes on spiral formations you may enjoy the notes on the big galaxy systems and then right down to the smaller planet and moon spiral systems. Mineral distribution always interested me. Understanding systems help us know where and when a thing might have come from and especially or most importantly where and when a thing might come into existence.
If or when our species can successfully go into deep space our energy usage will mean the difference between success and failure. Speed is only a tiny part of that success. Our olden days of sailings ships should have taught us that if the navigation is correct and the information regarding resources available at destinations along the way is correct then if our vessels can withstand the rigours and dangers of the oceans then and only then can success be left to little more than the fates of God.
Since our travel will be very slow compared to the rate that some systems proceed. If we find a new wonderful life-supporting planet now and plan to go there then by the time we spend our energy getting there it may easily have cooled further and cycled down to a baron, infertile, frozen wasteland unable to maintain its warmer climate cycles. As our planet will one day do.
Knowing what stars will produce life-suitable planets is the key to that success. As we look out and find more star systems with potentially life baring properties then we learn what those stars are like and should be able to configure the early stars, much like the recent significant mass ejection of the nearby star Betelgeuse and determine the signs and conditions of when these stars will give birth to new planets. It may take Billions of years to wait until it cools enough to start its climate cycles but most of that time may be taken up in our travel time to get there.
So we spend our energy getting to a place where a birth event has happened and then find a nice little moon or other body to set up camp and conserve our energy while we wait a billion years or so as the ejected materials mineralise to form their inner and outer planet pair and cool to be inhabitable. Can we interfere with it to speed up the process?.. Perhaps but anything we do will cost energy and energy ain’t cheap, free or easy to access and process in space.
Anyway, that’s a bridge we can cross if and when we get to it. For now, thanks again for your time.
Perhaps you can pop a tip in the Tip-Hat or JOY button below as appreciation for the musings. Your support and encouragement all help me write the next one. I’ll be enjoying a nice cup of coffee from you or just a little ticket to outer space. ;)
